Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

MARYLAND BLOGGER ALLIANCE
 

30 April 2007
Maryland Daily Record: A Wikipedia for All Things Maryland
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Maryland Daily Record, April 30, 2007:
What can you find on Crabopedia, a new Web site dedicated to all things Maryland? That’s up to you. Or your neighbor. Or your best friend’s brother’s girlfriend.

The site, launched by attorney and Reisterstown resident Bruce Godfrey, aspires to become a hyper-local community resource available to — and open for editing by — all Marylanders. The site uses wiki technology, which allows users to make changes to a site and was made popular by Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia featuring user-contributed information on everything from George Washington to military brats to the movie "Gremlins."
A big thank you to Ms. Berman for the coverage. Crabopedia is accessible at http://crabopedia.crablaw.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

Washington Post: Sexual Threats Stifle Some Female Bloggers
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Washington Post, April 30, 2007:
A female freelance writer who blogged about the pornography industry was threatened with rape. A single mother who blogged about "the daily ins and outs of being a mom" was threatened by a cyber-stalker who claimed that she beat her son and that he had her under surveillance. Kathy Sierra, who won a large following by blogging about designing software that makes people happy, became a target of anonymous online attacks that included photos of her with a noose around her neck and a muzzle over her mouth.

...

A 2006 University of Maryland study on chat rooms found that female participants received 25 times as many sexually explicit and malicious messages as males. A 2005 study by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that the proportion of Internet users who took part in chats and discussion groups plunged from 28 percent in 2000 to 17 percent in 2005, entirely because of the exodus of women. The study attributed the trend to "sensitivity to worrisome behavior in chat rooms."
For readers who are backlinking from the Washington Post article, click here to read Melissa McEwan drill the article with a tough counterpoint and then this logo to hear from actual targets of this garbage:



EDITOR NOTE (5/4): I was an East Asian Studies major at Princeton 100 years ago or so and will blame not early onset senility but a bad "acid flashback" from Kanji memorization from my last 300-level Japanese exam for the prior embarrassing misidentification of Washington Post reporter Ellen Nakashima as Ellen "Nakamura," both surnames being relatively common in Japan. The former name translates as "middle of the island," the latter as "middle of the village." I found the two-day Maryland Bar Exam much less stressful than that exam. When I realize how easy I found 200-level German and how hard I found 100-level Japanese, I shudder. But this is an embarrassing gaffe, and I regret it.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

29 April 2007
TBTB Denouement: Thank You
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Thank you to all who contributed and supported the Take Back the Blog! community event last evening, especially to those who shared their online and real-life personal experiences.

In response to Twisty's critical but supportive comments about the durable value of this community event, I half-jokingly noted that it is better to light one stick of dynamite than to curse the darkness. Well, I am exhausted and hope that others who found TBTB 2007 worthwhile - people who, unlike myself, have more or less functioning brains at the moment - would connect with each other to determine and take the next steps. Someone else should consider lighting the next stick of dynamite.

Best to all.

Labels:



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

28 April 2007
Take Back the Blog! Host Page
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

The Take Back the Blog! Blogswarm supports the rights of women to participate fully in all aspects of our society, including specifically online in the world of blogging but indeed everywhere and at all times, day and night, without fear of harassment, intimidation, sexual harassment, online stalking and slander, predation or violence of any sort.

This is a link to the LARGE LOGO, removed to improve load times; similarly, this is a link to an archive page for the prior version of this page as of the morning of April 28, 2007. I cannot begin to thank everyone on multiple continents who have promoted and contributed to this effort, but will attempt to do so below for the contributors.

I have singled out for a "Good Crabbing Award" a few people whose support was especially early, strong, or dramatic in effect, but quite arguably everyone who has contributed at all deserves three of them.

MANY MANY THANKS to Renee in Ohio for her vigorous and very early moral and promotional support of this effort and to both her and her husband for their rapid design and distribution pro bono publico of the jaw-dropping logos that appear on this page for this blogswarm.

HOW TO SUBMIT POSTS
to the Take Back the Blog! Blogswarm. I have set up a new email address at:

TBTB2007@crablaw.com

solely to receive links for TBTB. If you don't have a blog, but want to contribute, email me and we will work something out. The "cut-off" time will be 7 8 PM on Saturday, April 28 EST (extended due to volume of interest). To all, thank you, thank you so much for being part of this.

Throughout today (4/28) I will be adding to this page, as much as my two boys will let me. They go to bed around 7 PM so it's going to be an uneven trickle and then a gush. I simplfied the original alphabetizing plan to safe time. If you don't see your submitted post here, please email me if you have not heard from me.

UPDATE EARLY 4/29: The posts keep coming in. Long, wonderful day; my efficiency is dropping as my glasses are the wrong prescription, so reading is being more of a challenge. Also, I have to work tomorrow in DC at 9 AM, so it may not all get done before dawn. THANK YOU! If you have not gotten a thank you email from me, please forgive; it's because I am mildly overwhelmed.

UPDATE 2 4/29: I await content from three bloggers who have indicated directly to me an intent to contribute a post. But I need 2 hours of sleep and I need closure. In six hours, I will be reviewing multi-lingual corporate documents 50 miles from here on special overtime for 7 hours. So you may have a hard time getting hold of me between now and Monday night. Theoretically, have to sleep at some point. Thanks very much to all; the support and contribitions were inspiring and made the work worthwhile.

FINAL EDITION: TAKE BACK THE BLOG 2007 IS HEREBY CLOSED EXCEPT TO THOSE WHO HAVE ALREADY CONTACTED CRABLAW (2:45 AM 4/29).

BAC of Yikes!, whose motto starts "Don't agonize, organize," ties the need for an event such as Take Back the Blog! to sexist assumptions about women's career choices and pay equity. Rather than excerpt here, I would encourage you to bookmark the blog as a whole and check it all out. Many thanks, BAC.

Columnist Tze Ming Mok who writes Yellow Peril at New Zealand's Public Address writes of the intimidation attempts upon her and her response to them in "Are you gonna liberate us girls from male, white, corporate oppression?":
... the white supremacist movement (about four people - maybe more of a mah-jong group than a movement?), had a bad photo of me on a 'watchlist', which included a link to my phone number and address details. The purpose of this was to encourage harassment of me, due to my involvement in an anti-hate crimes march in Wellington 2004, on a day that ended with skinheads being routed from the city by a mob of bloodthirsty anarcho-punks. Naturally, I was also receiving a few nasty emails, sometimes threatening and graphic, via the Public Address feedback function, messages which I generally file under a 'Nazis' label and forget about unless they're particularly inventive.
At Wednesday's View, Kellie Powell describes the abuse that she took as a student journalist who dared to stand up for gay rights in her first year, first semester:
I remember walking to my class in a daze, wondering: How can so many people - who I have never even met - hate me so much? I was shocked by how much people hated gays, but I was even more shocked by the efforts they exerted to threaten me personally. I was called an "ugly fag hag." I was directed to a message board where people had posted photos of me, photos of my mother, and information about me from the campus directory. Someone even posted my class schedule.
WebWeaver checks in from Wellington New Zealand (TBTB2007 seems to have enjoyed a very strong showing from that proud country of 4 million!) and describes how she, a busy web developer, self-censors in her various blogging and other endeavors:
I work in a male-dominated industry (I'm a web developer), and although often I'm the only female coder in the office, my gender doesn't seem to have held me back at all. I'm in my dream job, working for the best web design company in the country. I think I'm doing OK.

And yet...and yet... the whole time I've been trying to compose this post I'm thinking that just because it hasn't happened to me yet doesn't mean it's not going to happen. I'm worrying about writing this as I write it because I'm afraid that even saying it hasn't happened is going to make it happen.
WebWeaver has additional coverage on her site of the reports about the threats and crimes against prominent tech blogger Kathy Sierra.

Velourmane focuses on systemic sexism in her analysis of harassment on- and 0ff-line:
Women who are identifiable as women are harrassed more online. This shouldn't be a shock to anyone who pays attention to, you know, life. Women are constructed as victims. It's not that all women are less strong than all men; I certainly know men who aren't very strong, who nevertheless don't have to worry about - say - taking a walk in the dark at night. The standard narrative constructs women as vulnerable targets, and appropriate victims, so even strong women are more likely to be targets for violence.
Uppity Rib brings her daily experiences in corporate communications to the experiences faced by women bloggers in Virtual Violence: Shining light on the dark side of the internet:
Significantly, even though the psychos have no idea who is reading their email, their rage is almost always expressed in a highly sexualized, misogynist manner. I could be a 55-year-old man for all they know, but their email will inevitably be some version of “fuck you bitch I hope you are gang raped and your children die of aids and your cunt is cut off.”

The bloggers are being assaulted with the same savagery, only their genders and contact information happen to be common knowledge.

Thus we wake from our dream of Utopia to acknowledge that misogyny is alive and well on Earth, and the internet is far from being immune. But I’m not worried. We’ve come a long way, baby, and it’s unlikely that women will retreat now just because the old foe has a new battle ground.

Kalimeg of Unrepentant Old Bat sets its straight about the "what about the men" crowd in All the Fit That's News:
What makes me craziest are the ones who begin by acting the part of "nice guys", but who get more and more defensive of their privilege until they suddenly turn and rend. That often happens when they are told that the topic in a given discussion is not going to focus on the men.
Journalist Devious Diva of This Is Not My Country took on racism in Greece in her investigation and reporting of the conditions faced by the Roma of Athens (often known improperly as "Gypsies.") When racists recently outed her personal ID, she stood strong. Crablaw is honored that she took time out of her schedule in light of recent pressures to contribute this brief but compelling post:
I have battled with stalkers, harrassment and threats almost since the beginning of my blogging experience but recent events really shook me to the core. I can honestly say that today, I am stronger and more determined than ever to continue in the battle I started.
Aicha Qandisha of Tales of Taromeet provides an example of non-blogosphere anonymous death threats against her free speech from her undergraduate days:
"You f***ing c***. Keep you f***ing ugly pie hole shut. Shut your ugly f***ing face....You better watch the f*** out. Watch you f***ing back. If you don't keep that ugly c*** of a mouth shut I will slit you f***ing throat."
Trinity of The Strangest Alchemy discusses the basic morality of privacy and respect of private identities online:
Coercion is a paradigm case of power over, and not only that but a paradigm case of its misuse.* Even people like me who think that not every form of power over is bad or wrong will agree that coercion is unacceptable. If you're really committed to limiting or stopping power over being used harm women (and, I would hope, being used to harm anyone at all), then I do not see how you can ever accept the idea that it's proper to coerce one.
New Zealander Span of Spanblather describes the all-white-boys club that frequently constitutes New Zealand politics and political blogging in XX in an XY World:
In a way the nz pol blogosphere is a reflection of the real world, although the arseholes are distilled and less avoidable. Often they come to you, and then if you tell them to leave you alone they get all "freedom of speech" on you and sometimes they start publishing your home address, emailing you disgusting things, generally making your life a misery. How do you get a restraining order online? And why should anyone need to anyway?
At Single-Dad v1.o, Single Dad stands bewildered and disgusted at the assholish conduct of men online. He has benefited from reading of the experiences of women bloggers:
This [his perspective] started changing when I entered the world of blogging and more importantly, actively reading blogs written by women.
Single Dad, I say keep going with what has clearly worked, and thank you for your support.

Jenna of Real Honest True Love tells of the sexualization of the political criticism she and other women students faced in student government as distinguished from what her male colleagues faced:
The other awful part was how hardly anyone stood up for me publicly. I got supportive e-mails and phone calls and talks over tea, but no one ever came out and said, STOP to his guy. And I don't know what to say about that, either. Maybe they were afraid of being targeted themselves. Maybe they didn't know what to do. I don't know.
Bill Hooker of Open Reading Frame - a site with a great blogroll - offers his succinct support:
It should go without saying, but it doesn't, so I'm adding my voice to those who are standing up and saying it today.
A Rose is a Rose of Nutmeg Grater makes a straight-forward call for justice in Today is Take Back the Blog Day:
we are EQUAL citizens of the world. we are your mothers, wives, partners, employers, employees, aunts, teachers, nurturers AND friends.
Aeroman of My Signature Weapon offers his law school grunt's-eye view of Yale Law School, the infamous AutoAdmit defamation controversies and the class implications of the decisions made by that academic community in response:
There's nothing inherently wrong with loyalty. But when we only defend those people to whom we think we owe that loyalty - especially if it's only owed through shared group membership - we effectively sort people into harassables and unharassables along lines of social and economic group power. That's hardly a desirable goal.
Anna McCormack, Editor-in-Chief of Ms. JD, a online magazine for women attorneys and law students, was kind enough to link to TBTB and to provide further links to a commented post regarding how the Yale Law School community addressed the AutoAdmit defamation of its students.

INTERMISSION

I thank the following contributors for their generous support of this TBTB blog. They have blogged about certain issues involving tensions within the more radical end of the feminist blogosphere. This is a topic with which I am simply ignorant, so I wont be offering comments. I don't just appear stupid about this subject; it's real, genuine article stupidity. But thank you for supporting TBTB, and I am open to doing a full, separate post in the future for the full examination of these issues.

Fetch Me My Axe


Herdwatching

END INTERMISSION

Mental Hygiene of Mental Hygine Unit sees beyond the blogosphere in "Take Back the ..."
But please, let's not stop after we get finished typing out our posts. We must speak with our dollars and use our time wisely. We must not be afraid to stand up for ourselves or to challenge something that perpetuates the myths about women that some find entertaining and ego-boosting.
Red Stapler of Me and My Red Stapler distills core equations of the online male troll harasser:
Normal person + Internet Connection + anonymity = raging asshole. (Apologies to the creators of Penny Arcade.)

Throw some male entitlement and rape culture fuels onto the fire, and you have most blogs and forums on the internet.
Lindsay Beyerstein of Majikthise provides a measured, compelling case for Standing Our Ground:
The good news is that the progressive blogosphere rallied behind these victims and held up the ugliness of their harassers for all to see. I hope we can continue to build on this pattern of mutual support.

So, instead of pledging to take back the blog, let's say loud and clear that women aren't going anywhere. People of good will are going to stand together and force the bullies out.

Crablaw remains greatly indebted to Lindsay Beyerstein's support for this project, which was early, strong and remoralizing in moments of doubt and fatigue.

Ioana Contu of Ladyfest Romania is working to organize the first Take Back the Night march in Bucharest in October 2007. Although readers of most Romance languages may be able to understand much of the flyer at the Ladyfest page, Ioana helpfully describes the content as follows:
The info on the flyer in Romanian is a call to action for people and a little explanation on what is TBTN.

First paragraph explains how violence against women is a big human right problem in Romania as well as in other places in the world. Also that in our country too often the responsibility for change is left in the hands of authorities and NGOs that are slow and inefficient and how we need direct action to happen.

The rest is a few words about what TBTN is, what kind of experience it can make for a woman and how a group of women can make it happen.
Ioana, thank you very kindly, especially re: my error in accidentially removing links to your site; it was accidental during a long night. Best wishes for success in your efforts in Bucharest and mulţumesc!

Kim of Kimbaland describes the fear of violence and the deference to the feelings of males with which many women are instilled from an early age:
My mother also taught me to be afraid, like most mothers do. The lurking danger of being raped was the backdrop of my adolescence; the rationale behind many curfew decisions, the reason a particular activity wouldn’t be allowed, the justification for the irritating differences between what I could do and what my younger brothers could do.

I don’t think these experiences are unique. Nor do I think that rape is an issue that parents of girls shouldn’t be worried about. But teaching daughters that men are emotionally fragile, physically aggressive potential rapists who need to have their needs met no matter what (again, what is the inverse of this?) invites the kind of behavior we see on the internet.
Liz Ditz of I Speak of Dreams has very kindly provided a parallel commentary and blogswarm to this one - many thanks for your hard work, Liz! Her post has a dramatic logo that I like for the blogswarm, but which will not fit easily on this narrow column of mine and is detailed enough that a "shrink" of it won't do it justice. (Though I remain in love with Renee's raised fist logo....) Liz has a very thoughtful prior post linked on her TBTB page regarding nasty troll and defamation issues in various fora, some specific to issues of women bloggers and some not. Thanks, Liz!!!

I never leave the house without incident
's Sassywho identifies herself as a 3rd Generation American since her grandmother did not receive full citizenship rights as a voter untilt he passage of the 19th Amendment. But as Sassywho notes, voting is not enough:
Voting alone is not enough of a voice, it takes more engagement than that to fully participate in life. Those who already have a voice and already have representation can not fully understand the concessions and sacrifices made by those aching to be heard. A woman as an authority in any matter is subject to criticism, as anyone is. However, there is readily a laundry list to dismiss her expertise simply because she is a woman. As is tradition in our culture, if that can't shut her up violence and threats have always been incredibly efficient. It's worked on the internet, in the boardroom, on the factory floor, and in homes.
Twisty Faster makes it perfectly clear on the front page masthead: I Blame the Patriarchy. And she is inclined to view this Take Back the Blog event as merely the "Big Whoop of the Week" because dealing with patriarchal violence is the core competence of her blog, day-to-day. But Crablaw remains grateful for her support as well as her characteristically blunt assessment of the limits of what a one-day blogospheric event can do:
Time for a Twisty bromide: Women’s oppression is a global humanitarian crisis. Any so-called political blogger who (a) who does not explicitly, strenuously, and regularly denounce it, and (b) condones an antifeminist commentarian zeitgeist, might as well rename their stupid blog "I Defend the Conviction that Male Abuse of Women Constitutes the Natural Order, Now Where Are the Boobies?"
John Goff of i am jack's non-blog focuses on and links to how misogynists intend and make efforts specifically to silence women in the blogosphere and beyond:
The threats, the hate, the abuse directed towards female bloggers (see see see see see) all involve one end. Female silence. There's other misogynist undercurrents, of course, but in the end, that isn't as important as getting women to not speak up.
Alice Marshall of GOTV has done a massive lot of fantastic work to support this effort both leading up to today and today on her blog. Thank you so much, Alice!!!! In addition to all of the promotional and organizational work she has done/is doing, Alice has posted a Congressional legislative update on eight bills dealing with domestic and international efforts to stop sexual violence, stalking, predation and murder of women, in varying procedural postures to date. Those Crablaw readers who are connected with Capitol Hill or the lobbying efforts on such bills should consider visiting Alice's site and share the wealth of your wisdom.

Focusing on sexual violence outside the blogosphere, Dan of Fitness for the Occasion discusses why we need to discuss rape more openly, opening with a story of a subversive choice of his 12th grade political theory teacher:
Earlier in the week, a student had been raped. A freshman girl had been forced into oral sex by an upperclassman (and member of some sports team). Those in the know had been expressly forbidden from discussing the matter. This wasn’t something that went into the papers, nor something which spread around campus quickly, like when we had our Columbine scare (which fortunately turned out to be a false alarm). What still sticks with me is Ms. F starting the class by closing the door stating this was a topic she was not allowed to bring up, but one we needed to talk about. The chairs were in a circle, and we started to talk. About the rape being covered up. About what we would do if it was us being forced. If it had been a friend in either position. About what rape itself was.
Heather Corinna of Femmerotic provides a detailed, extended counterpoint to the experiences of women bloggers in the large categories of political and tech blogging through her personal and blogging experiences as a blogger on the topic of sexuality:
A handful of years back, I had a brief relationship (far briefer in the actual relationship than in the aftermath, unfortunately) with another blogger which very quickly became emotionally abusive when the limits and boundaries I’d made clear I needed were simply not those he desired, and which from the start, he’d only said were okay because he’d clearly decided for himself he could ignore them completely. What was supposed to be, agreed to be, a temporary stay in my apartment until he found housing of his own very quickly escalated into a long-term cohabitation I incessantly protested, and which became a tool used to manipulate me with daily.

One can only reasonably assume that when someone goes into a forum or blog and contributes in any way to verbal abuse, women-hating and stalking, it is because they enjoy doing so, because they like the veritable masked gang-bang, and because when the invitation to do so is in any way extended, they are happy to accept. I simply do not see any other conclusion to reach from where I’m sitting.

* * *

I’m not sure how I feel about having stayed silent, and even still staying partially silent now, giving only the Cliff’s Notes. Part of me feels like a chicken-shit, and like my silence, like so many silences, enabled the whole culture of silence that I do work to try and dismantle every day.

Jill Filipovic of Feministe has promised a post, and Crablaw remains grateful for her strong and early support of this endeavor.

Greensmile of The Executioners Thong provides several detailed analyses of possible responses to predatory trolls, with an eye towards many of the discussions in the aftermath of the threats of violence and online predation against Kathy Sierra. Greensmile:
The abuse of freedom is really hard to curb without curbing the freedom. The hollaback would be a good thing, but if it really worked, assholes would cover up their real identities faster than they cover their nuts in street fight. and spawning pseudonyms is too cheap these days.
The following post I prepared for this Blogswarm last of all. Divine Lavender of Lavender Squirts, a private blog, offered her compelling 30 Ways I am Thriving, which uses intensely personal and mature language to discuss intensely personal and mature topics. Because Lavender Squirts is a private blog, Crab Media will host 30 Ways I Am Thriving at Ms. Lavender's discretion. Frankly, it was preserving Ms. Lavender's voice - intact, despite my uneven skills at amateur web layout - on this post that made the work worthwhile into the night.

Dante and the Lobster's Medbh offers her brief but warm support to TBTB; thank you, Medbh!

Cara of The Curvature gets to the point with efficiency and fire in defense of Kathy Sierra and all women bloggers:
I have absolutely no criticism for Kathy Sierra and how she handled her situation. I have nothing but sympathy for what she went through. No one should ever be threatened with sexual violence, even if it "wasn't serious." No one should have their social security number posted online. That's not criticism or a game; it's fucking assault. And anyone who tries to tell you that there weren't misogynist motivations behind it is either a liar or an idiot.

But we have to take back the blog for the same reason that our ancestors had to fight for the right to vote; because we will never be given that which we don't demand.
Cap'n Dyke, Lesbian Pirate Queen and Rogue Blogger steps away from ship maintenance and fighting scurvy to provide a defense of the human and civil rights of women on the blogosphere in Gentle Men on th’Ship, Look Away; This Not Be for Ye. From Cap'n Dyke in her original Pirate-ese prose:
Oh, wait, that probably won’t happen, because o’ th’women who’ve been brain-washed t’believe their sole-purpose in life is t’serve ye. Mmmm, I wonder who taught them that? That they aren’t as good as ye… Whoops, somethin’ be amiss here because women live longer, have a higher pain tolerance, have greater endurance an’ better health an’ have higher GPA in education an’ are goin’ t’college in greater numbers than ye are.

It be not only time t’Take Back th’Blog from bullies who couldn’t say th’things they do t’people’s faces (isn’t havin’ a blog wonderful?), but t’take back humanity for women. Women are th’targets o’other people’s lack o’self-confidence in th’bloggin’ community an’ in their everyday lives.

Bubba's Nightmare brings the doom to the "Bubba's" and "duuuuudes of the World" who fail or refuse to call sexism by its name in Blogswarm for us all:
The next time you hear some Bubba leerily harass a woman on the sidewalk, speak up. When you hear about some outrage committed by public officials, write a well-thought-out rational letter (a real paper-and-ink letter) to them. And (most especially) when you see a blog post, or a comment to a blog post, that spews sexual hatred or ignorance or condescension, don’t sit silently.

Fight the good fight, y’all. You’re fighting for all of humanity on this one.

Blue Gal provides a straight-forward defense of her and all bloggers' dignity and freedom in the subtlely titled "You bet your ass we're taking back the blog":
And that loss of anonymity brings with it the whole problem. I'm a woman. Exposure might lead to all kinds of unwanted attention, and I'm pretty good at deflecting that, but watching what happened to a woman who didn't mean to offend anyone....

...just not sure I wanna go there. And folks, it happens. All the time. If I had an extra half hour I could link to six or seven women telling of the time they were threatened physically by an anonymous message. Here's one, found with no effort whatsoever. I know. I know.
In Being Bothered to Help, Sylvia of The Anti-Essentialist Conundrum uses the analogy of solving a jigsaw puzzle to focus on the human dynamics surrounding sexual violence, predation, stalking and the tendency of people to distance themselves from recognizing and empathizing with the targets of such crimes:
In human experience, you’d think this dynamic would play out differently, but I don’t think it does. Sometimes we can’t see the individual pieces for the entire puzzle. We can’t see that overarching clue-bat signaling sexual violence because we’re too busy scoffing at its bruises. We’re too quick to assign the brutality and abuse as mundane, perhaps rightfully and wrongfully for the same reason: it happens more often than we want to admit. We need to stop reducing violence against women to a platitude. We need to destroy the “if and only if” situations in which we choose to act. Even if all we can do is find a treatment number, go to a self-defense class with the person, or stay alert for a sign of the person’s concern, we need to do something. If everyone focused on one different, lesser problem, the bigger problem has a higher chance of being averted. But it takes initiative and willingness to do something. We have to face the abnormal. We have to confront what bothers us and question ourselves about why certain events have become commonplace.
Being Amber Rhea's eponymous blogger discusses "civil discourse" with either regular and "snark" quotes around the term:
Being an eternal optimist, I’m confident that civil discourse is possible - but only if those of us who are interested in it put our collective foot down and refuse to tolerate abuse, hate speech, threats, silencing, and other such bullshit that most certainly does not fall under the umbrella of Free Speech.

Further, this means wishy-washy assholes like Kos who’re showing their true colors in light of the recent discussions about online bullying and such, should continue to be called on their bullshit.

Jen of Academic Pointillism asks directly: Why are there so few women on Digg?:
Since geek culture is predominantly male-dominated, it is not surprising that sites like digg feature quasi-pornographic images on the front page, or that geek conventions feature booths with bikini-clad babes pushing products and computer games that even have female characters generally sexualize the hell out of them.
* * * * * * * *

Crablaw thanks the following additional blogs and bloggers to be listed below who did not per se submit a substantive post for formal inclusion by email to TBTB2007@crablaw.com, but did kindly promote or discuss this effort (if either Technorati or I have negligently omitted you, please email me and I will link to you here.) If you WANT your substantive post listed as part of the TBTB Blogswarm, or I missed you by error, email me and I will do so; just trying to respect the freedom of every blogger to associate or not to associate. This list will be expanding as the day goes on.

Amanda Marcotte of Pandagon.
Jill of Women and Tech News.
Jinja at Webbed Feet, Web Log.
Anja of "Lesen statt Putzen" [German for Reading instead of cleaning]
All sites of all commenters.

UPDATE (4/30): Article in the Washington Post by Ellen Nakamura on recent events along the theme of this blogswarm.

Labels: , , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

25 April 2007
William Grim of FrontPage: Modern German Antisemitism
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

William Grim, a free-lance writer based in Germany, wrote an essay six months ago about modern antisemitism in Germany. I am not an avid reader of FrontPage but anything involving either antisemitism or Germany, let alone both, is likely to catch my attention. Soccer Dad included a link to fellow Baltimore blogger Laz-a-fare's discussion of this article on SD's latest "If you haven't ... you must" list.

Grim starts off with two brief anecdotes about his experiences in Germany. The first is seeing kids on a bus ooh-ing over granddad's copy of Mein Kampf and a VCR tape of Goebbels' speeches, and the second is a businessman who repeats antisemitic canards about Jews and money at a table during a discussion of an apparently tense business negotiation with a Jewish American. From these two examples, and apparently other examples that Mr. Grim did not identify in detail, Mr. Grim has concluded that German antisemitism is extremely alive and well.

These examples do not give me much confidence in his thesis. Mr. Grim's bio is not available at WND, but I will assume that he is moderately fluent in German. Holding a job in Germany does not necessarily require full fluency in German; so many Germans speak English fluently, often without much of a noticeable accent, that survival in the medium term on assignment is entirely possible without fluency. But if one assumes that Mr. Grim knows a substantial amount of spoken German beyond the two German words that appear in his essay, including the Bavarian dialect which would likely permeate much of his environment in suburban Munich, then one should examine the thesis on its merits.

School kids looking at something forbidden with morbid fascination is nothing new. When I stayed in Germany as an exchange student 22 years ago, I had the occasion to visit a German swimming pool. Those who are familiar with German sunbathing habits will recall that nude and especially semi-nude sunbathing by German women is extremely common and is regarded generally with a colossal "yawn" by German teenage males. Why? It is not forbidden, so it is uninteresting or at least not interesting in any unusual way. I was not exactly stopped cold by the sight of 75-100 half-naked or naked young German women swimming in the local swimming pool, sunbathing, reading novels, arguing with their boyfriends, but it surprised the heck out of me at age 16; here in the States that is almost unheard of and certainly was in 1985. But Nazi propaganda is not only taboo in Germany but, with exceptions for a few things like postage stamps, strictly contraband and illegal to possess privately. Mein Kampf, on the other hand, is required reading in some high school history classes here (was in mine; my copy of Mein Kampf from 10th grade European history class probably could not have accompanied me to Germany.)

I have personally heard fellow attorneys, including colleagues in firms where I have worked with both Jewish and non-Jewish attorneys in Pikesville, repeat the same antisemitic canards about Jews and money. (How businessmen in any field ever came to regard a focus on money as somehow derogatory is beyond me - what, should businessmen focus instead on the secretary's figure or the weather? - but I digress.) Antisemitism is alive and well in Pikesville. And Parkville. And Reisterstown. Apparently also in at least one suburb of Munich.

What Mr. Grim fails to mention (leading me to suspect linguistic deficiency) is any mention of the reunification of Germany: the biggest event to occur in Germany in 40 years. The absence of any mention of this fact, any mention of the 40 years of Soviet domination of East German and the Berlin Wall, any mention of the failure of Communist Germany to come to any meaningful terms whatsoever with its own Nazi past in the same manner as did West Germany - these are glaring omissions. Much of the antisemitic violence, neo-Nazi marches, etc. has been in the economically devastated post-Communist and non-deNazified East. This fact weakens (although does not destroy) Mr. Grim's arguments about Germany as a whole; the part that exhibits the worst antisemitism is the part that has been least bathed in Western liberal values.

Where I think Mr. Grim is strongest is in his discussion of the centrality of antisemitism to German culture. To coin a phrase, if you have not read On the Jews and Their Lies by Martin Luther (full-text or relevant excerpts), you must. Among the lesser offenses that Hitler committed was plagiarism of Luther's advice to seize Jewish-owned assets, burn synagogues, silence rabbis and bar Jews from travel. The Nazi Party really did the memory of Luther a disservice by failing to name Kristallnacht after Luther, though they did have the gratitude to execute Kristallnacht on his 455th birthday. The language that this former friar used to describe Jews in Germany and elsewhere was horrific; he remains in his horror a core figure, perhaps the core figure, of classical German culture, the equivalent of George Washington, King James and William Shakespeare combined for anglophone U.S. citizens. His German translation of the Bible remains standard for Protestant Germans and for some German Catholics.

I do not know that Grim's argument about the Free Democratic Party (small "kingmaker" liberal/libertarian party) using antisemitism as a campaign tool was accurate. For one thing, not many Muslims in Germany are actually voting citizens under Germany's blood-not-soil citizenship laws, though that is beginning to change. For another, I don't know from the reports I read that the FDP was actually engaged institutionally in the antisemitism attributed to one of its disgraced officials. Sort of like the Republican Party not being categorically racist everywhere because Trent Lott praised Strom Thurmond's segregationist past once. On the other hand, neo-Nazi parties with varying-sized fig leaves are a real issue in Germany and would have been a good topic for Grim to cover.

It should be noted that while antisemitism is a core element of Germany's cultural development, the same can be said for most of Germany's neighbors. The rabid glee with which the many of the non-German conquered peoples of Eastern Europe frequently participated in the Final Solution - in Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Croatia and elsewhere - should lead one to recognize European antisemitism as a European and Christian (Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox) problem which history's ultimate antisemitic state exploited across Europe to unspeakable murderous effect. Luther was not the only antisemitic Christian figure; the early Church figure St. John Chrysostom was murderously foul in his language against the Jewish communities of his day.

The arguments about Mr. Grim's colloquies re: historical revisionism with German acquaintances should be viewed as part of a general propensity for Germans to argue. Being blunt is considered a German virtue, as is stubbornness or steadfastness (the former when someone you don't like is doing it, the latter when you do it.) Germans, like their French neighbors, love a good argument and are not pushovers. They will try out arguments to gauge a person, to test his intelligence, to figure out what his true beliefs are. This business of never discussion sex, politics or religion doesn't hold over their for politics or sex (for religion, it definitely does.) It is possible that some of Mr. Grim's interlocutors were baiting him rather than spreading the Fourth Reich. On the other hand, claiming that "the Jews" [sic] were responsible for the Holocaust is simply beyond belief.

As for German knowledge of the Final Solution at the time, both the New York Times and the martyred anti-Nazi bloggers of their day, the Scholl siblings - mere broke students at the University of Munich down the street from Mr. Grim's current home - knew of the Final Solution. So yes, the claims that most Germans did not support Hitler or that the Final Solution was not known are lies. If you see the tapes of Germans interviewed post-war about what they knew and when they knew it, the face of deception is remarkably easy to see, even for someone not particularly gifted at reading people. The Scholl siblings in their leaflets regarding the concentration and death camps exclaimed "We are the White Rose - We are your guilty conscience!!!", but the guilty conscience is plainly visible in the old tapes I have seen of the late forties and early fifties.

As for today, Mr. Grim may be correct in his conclusion but I don't know that he has made his case. Munich is the most conservative big city in Germany by most measures; Bavaria has its own special conservative party because the regular conservative party for the rest of Germany is not conservative enough. Sort of like Texas, in a way, but I digress. Mr. Grim did not mention whether his definition of German extends beyond the infamously conservative suburbs of Munich, whether he has spent time in Berlin, in the left-leaning Ruhr-Gebiet reminiscent of industrial New Jersey, in liberal Hamburg. I don't know whether he has met the liberal and radical youth who make Cindy Sheehan look like a Chamber of Commerce parliamentarian, who cite Sophie Scholl as the most important woman of the entire 20th century in poll after poll, the Love Parade that outdoes San Francisco and Greenwich Village combined. Hitler got started in Munich and Grim lives there, but there's another 90 million people in the country to get to know. My verdict: fairly well-presented but not proven.

Thank you both to Soccer Dad (especially for an embarrassing error in my citing the wrong publication initially on the first draft) and to Laz-a-fare. I had cited initially to WorldNetDaily instead of FrontPageMag; somehow I got that signal crossed late in the evening.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

WJZ.com: Identity Thief Uses Fake Lawyer ID To Have Sex In Prison
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

WJZ.com, April 25, 2007:
Tiffany Weaver had on dark sunglasses to walk from court past the TV cameras Wednesday after pleading guilty to identity theft.

She admits to charges she had a fake bar association ID card and used it to get into a Baltimore prison to vist her boyfriend Jason Moody. Moody had just been sentenced on manslaughter charges.

...

Lawyer Amanda Sprehn tells Eyewitness News the theft of her identity and the rumors of sex with an inmate caused stress.

"Your name is dragged through the mud and unfortunately someone hears my name they're gonna associate it with this incident as opposed to this wonderful attorney from Annapolis who tries great cases," said Sprehn.
The prison romance part of the story is the least interesting to me.

The report does not state whether the lawyer's ID was merely copied or outright stolen, but I gather the former from this case transmittal. My own Maryland license is active but my MSBA ID is expired after 18 months of focusing on DC work. But if I recall correctly, the Maryland State Bar Association administers the photo ID process in consultation with the Sheriff's Departments of the various counties and the Court of Appeals. Basically, a licensed attorney (whether a member of the voluntary MSBA or not) prepares a simple application to the MSBA for a court ID. The MSBA checks on the bona fides of the application, and forwards the application to a Sheriff's office. The attorney sets an appointment with the Sheriff to get the photo ID actually made from a couple of passport photos that the lawyer brings to the Sheriff's office, though I have heard that some Sheriffs will take a photo at their office. After waiting 5-10 minutes they hand you a laminated ID, which is good for expedited, no-check and no-X-ray entry into most courts in the state.

To fake one of these ID's is not hard for a quick pass-through. I have heard that a few courts no longer honor them, or require that the ID be registered with the Court's own deputies and a special stamp or punch put into the ID for it to be honored. Attorneys can certainly get into court without an ID, but they stand in line with everyone else outside in the heat, the humidity and the cold (yeah, been there.) I don't have a problem with expediting lawyers in with a special ID; lawyers are court officers and are needed in court promptly for the expedition of cases out the door, especially on volume dockets and dockets with pre-hearing negotiations like traffic court, collections and the like.

I have no idea what market there is for a fake ID. The colors on the paper change from time to time, I believe, so old ID's will age. I suspect at some point the Court of Appeals will order the production of formal Bar Cards for all attorneys, not just those with court practices. Most states use Bar Cards and Bar ID numbers frequently; Maryland is unusual in its sparse administrative structure on such matter. Maryland has the lowest Bar dues in the country, or did the last time I checked (DC's are not much higher), so the Court of Appeals is reluctant to issue mandates that might result in increases in annual dues, I gather.

The scary part about this is that a criminal with a fake ID can easily smuggle a firearm into a courthouse. Take me. I look like Joe Average white guy. A lot of lawyers look like Joe Average white guy; there are a lot of white guys in this line of work and most of them/us look like Brad Pitt's tax lawyer, not like Brad Pitt. So an average white guy could fake an ID and likely pass if he wore a suit and carried himself like a regular. The odds of his briefcase getting scanned or opened are fairly low if the ID is solid and he plays it cool.

This forger went the full route. Getting the attorney's correct phone number shows attention to detail.

Frankly, I went back and forth about writing this post, but the value of sunshine on this issue probably outweighs the concern that some whackjob or vengeful ex-husband is a Crablaw Maryland Weekly reader, taking notes. I do agree that jail is appropriate - not for the unauthorized sex but for forging a courthouse security document.

Labels: , , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

Josh Marshall on How the Democrats Should Punch Back At The White House
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Josh Marshall of TPM Media, April 25, 2007:
Democrats should just hit right back on how President Bush has been helping Osama bin Laden for almost six years. Sounds harsh. But it's true. Consider the facts. President Bush had bin Laden trapped in the mountains of Tora Bora. But he let bin Laden get away because Bush wanted to focus on Saddam Hussein instead. The president and the White House tried to lie about this during the 2004 election. But since then the evidence has become overwhelming. President Bush decided to let bin Laden get away so he could get ready to attack Saddam Hussein. So pretty much anything bin Laden does from here on out is on President Bush. And how about Iraq? President Bush has screwed things up so badly that he's created a whole new generation of recruits for bin Laden. He's created a whole new army for bin Laden. Not by being tough but by being stupid. And by being too much of a coward to admit his mistakes once it was obvious that the occupation of Iraq was helping bin Laden specifically and the jihadist agenda in general.
I have taken a lot of hard shots at Bush of late, impugning his character and that of his administration. But in fairness, I think a lot of this disaster was incompetence and a failure to adjust culturally from the world of screwing up businesses to the world of screwing up governments, armies and diplomatic standing of a world power, rather than bad faith.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

Laura Bush: No One Suffers More than George Bush Regarding the Iraq War
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Joe Sudbay of AMERICABlog.com, April 25, 2007:
Listen, you Americans, Laura Bush wants you to know the President is suffering over Iraq. In fact, Laura told Anne Curry on the Today Show, that the American people need to know that "no one suffers more than their President and I do." No one? She's as delusional as her husband. Of course, her husband is the person who caused the suffering -- and is the one person who can end it.
Video of Interview with Mrs. Bush is at AMERICABlog.









I have a hard time seeing George W. Bush exclaiming Eli, eli, lama sabachthani from the midst of his Crawford, Texas brush clearing duties. Then again, he is a Purple Heart recipient as of this week for extraordinary bravery and heroism under criticism from commentators so maybe I am showing disrespect to the injuries that he suffered. It may be hard for him, with so many of his closest allies under investigation, subpoena, indictment or residence in the least attractive federal housing projects.

I reproach myself for having been so restrained in my criticism of the President and his administration of late; this lassitude represents a character flaw of mine, that of laziness and a lack of firmitas and industria, which I will endeavor to improve, through a greater focus of criticism upon these narcissistic criminals.

UPDATE: clammyc of Booman Tribune said it better than I did.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

Examiner: Web 2.0 Not Good News for Conservative Politics
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Baltimore Examiner, April 25, 2007:
Last fall in this space, I asked, “When will the right recognize the cost of conceding Web 2.0?” With that cost now readily apparent in the form of online campaign contributions for the 2008 presidential campaign cycle, the only remaining question is whether conservatives can do anything about it in time for the elections next fall. It appears likely the answer will be a resounding no.

In the first quarter of this year, Democratic candidates raised almost $80 million, far ahead of the Republican candidates, who combined raised just over $50 million. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., raised $6.9 million over the Internet from 50,000 individuals, most of whom gave in small amounts. That means they can be tapped again during the campaign. More than 8,000 individuals signed up as volunteers through the Obama Web site.

...

Sam Vaknin, an award-winning author and Ph.D, tracked 154 keywords in Google from 1999 to 2006. According to Vaknin’s unscientific study, Wikipedia, launched in 2001, is now the No. 1 search result for 128 out of 154 keywords (83 percent).

...

Wikipedia’s own Countering System Bias Project describes the typical Wikipedian as technically inclined, formally educated white males between the ages of 15 and 49. A closer look reveals a strong affinity for far-left politics. Many Wikipedians are bloggers or regular readers of left-wing blogs.

Folks on the right would be well advised to start asking this question. Having attended WikiMania 2006 last summer at Harvard Law School, I can assure them they will not like what they find.
The standard liberal joke is that facts themselves have a well-known liberal bias. There is no good reason why conservatives cannot pariticipate in Wikipedia unless there is systematic hostility to conservative views from Wikipedia's president Jimmy Wales on down. A number of conservatives formed a conservative wiki recently that had some embarrassing problems including bad science facts and, more damningly, a miserable load interface that took forever to open.

AM Radio and Fox News cater to an older clientele, not just a more conservative one. The average age of a Bill O'Reilly viewer is about 10-15 years older than Bill O'Reilly, according to reports. Younger voters do tend to be more liberal, but not uniformly so. A united conservative expedition into Wikipedia could turn the tide, one would think, particularly if it were a conservative but not "way out there." I think this particularly true in areas on topic that conservatives most typically enjoy discussing. Not many rock-ribbed conservatives want to talk about pre-school educational issues; not many left-wing granola tie-dye flakes want to discuss throw weights on missiles and thermobaric bombs (the ones that spray gasoline "Lysol" in a tunnel or cave, light a match and carbonize all organic matter therein, good for an Osama Kebob, well done.)

Labels:



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

24 April 2007
ESPN: Pat Tillman's Death
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

ESPN, April 25, 2007:
According to the Army officer who directed the first official inquiry, the Army might have more of a clue about the shooter's identity than it has let on. Asked whether ballistics work was done to identify who fired the fatal shots, Lt. Col. Ralph Kauzlarich told ESPN.com, "I think, yeah, they did. And I think they know [who fired]. But I never found out."

...

"But there [have] been numerous unfortunate cases of fratricide, and the parents have basically said, 'OK, it was an unfortunate accident.' And they let it go. So this is — I don't know, these people have a hard time letting it go. It may be because of their religious beliefs."

...

In an interview with ESPN.com, Kauzlarich said: "When you die, I mean, there is supposedly a better life, right? Well, if you are an atheist and you don't believe in anything, if you die, what is there to go to? Nothing. You are worm dirt. So for their son to die for nothing, and now he is no more — that is pretty hard to get your head around that. So I don't know how an atheist thinks. I can only imagine that that would be pretty tough."

Asked by ESPN.com whether the Tillmans' religious beliefs are a factor in the ongoing investigation, Kauzlarich said, "I think so. There is not a whole lot of trust in the system or faith in the system [by the Tillmans]. So that is my personal opinion, knowing what I know."

Asked what might finally placate the family, Kauzlarich said, "You know what? I don't think anything will make them happy, quite honestly. I don't know. Maybe they want to see somebody's head on a platter. But will that really make them happy? No, because they can't bring their son back."

Kauzlarich, now 40, was the Ranger regiment executive officer in Afghanistan, who played a role in writing the recommendation for Tillman's posthumous Silver Star. And finally, with his fingerprints already all over many of the hot-button issues, including the question of who ordered the platoon to be split as it dragged a disabled Humvee through the mountains, Kauzlarich conducted the first official Army investigation into Tillman's death.

That investigation is among the inquiries that didn't satisfy the Tillman family.

"Well, this guy makes disparaging remarks about the fact that we're not Christians, and the reason that we can't put Pat to rest is because we're not Christians," Mary Tillman, Pat's mother, said in an interview with ESPN.com. Mary Tillman casts the family as spiritual, though she said it does not believe in many of the fundamental aspects of organized religion.

"Oh, it has nothing to do with the fact that this whole thing is shady," she said sarcastically, "But it is because we are not Christians."
Pat Tillman was an atheist and, possibly, a hero. Or not. We don't know.

We do know that the investigating officer is focusing on the lack of Christian religious beliefs of Tillman's family and of Tillman himself.

Does an atheist have rights that a Christianized state will respect, even upon dying as an atheist in a foxhole (which, slanders and frauds aside, there are aplenty and will continue to be)? I am beginning to suspect that that is not the case in practice.

To hold a family, regardless of religion or non-religion, in mocking contempt for wanting to know the truth of their son's killing, and mocking their religious or non-religious beliefs with specificity as a source of their grief, should be an accountability moment for Colonel Kauzlarich's career.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

Baltimore Sun: Urban Renewal Around West Baltimore MARC Station
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Baltimore Sun, April 24, 2007:
This is no Penn Station. There are no coffee shops or places to buy a paper, just mounds of trash along the side and a few partial shelters that don't do much good in the rain and snow.

But city and state planners view the threadbare West Baltimore train station as the potential key to unleashing the redevelopment of an area long neglected and decimated by an unfortunate endeavor dubbed "the highway to nowhere."

...

A few blocks away, Zelda Robinson, a 66-year-old community activist and longtime West Baltimore resident, recalls the last time planners came to them with visions of a transportation plan - and ended up dividing a community.

The "highway to nowhere," they call it now.

The wounds, she says, still sting.

"People have not forgotten what took place when this area was going to be used for that expressway," says Robinson, who lives in Midtown Edmondson and leads the West Baltimore Coalition consisting of representatives from 15 different area neighborhoods.

...

It is a weekday evening, and city and state planners and residents gather in the Edmondson Community Center, the thump of bass from cars driving by filtering into the room.

Paul Morris with PB Placemaking, a consultant hired by the state, cheerfully presents the group with a series of slides titled, "West Baltimore Transit Centered Community Development."

...

When a woman asks about making some of the vast spaces from the highway to nowhere into green space, Morris tells them they can turn their streets into their own version of the Champs-Elysees, the famous boulevard in Paris.
It doesn't have to be the Champs-Elysees. Getting that troubled extended neighborhood to the level of Highlandtown or Govans would be amazing. Certainly the commuter population helps, but if you want to attract the yuppies, you need Starbucks and gyms. Once you get Starbucks and fitness centers, you have a shot at getting internet cafes, i.e. places where people with things to do and cash to spend will do things and spend cash.

The neighborhood is not a disaster by Baltimore standards, but it's a hard sell when housing in Arbutus is reasonably priced, taxed generally less unless an empowerment zone applies and is 7 minutes shorter (and $25.00 a month cheaper) on the MARC. West Baltimore Station is not yet a realistic car-free zone for people who have choices to live elsewhere; people won't go car free voluntarily there because shopping for both household goods and groceries is not nearby by rapid transit. Baltimore's Metro goes nowhere near the neighborhood and the buses roll SLOW. Plus standing out on the street for a late bus is dangerous, especially for women who make up a massive segment of the D.C. federal workforce and MARC commuter pool.

But maybe there's hope. Of course, might be nice if they fixed up Halethorpe station to make it actually ADA compliant too, but that would take, ahem, leadership.

Labels: , , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

23 April 2007
Copperas Cove Herald: Bush to Receive Purple Heart
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

Copperas Cove (TX) Herald, April 19, 2007 (HAT TIP to Crooks and Liars):
Bill and Georgia Thomas reported they were elated Monday when they met in the Oval Office with President George W. Bush to present him with a Purple Heart.

"We were just absolutely bowled over. Without reservation, it was one of the highlights of our life. He was such a gracious host," Thomas said. "It was just an incredible, incredible experience."

The couple was able to meet with President Bush for about 20 minutes to present him with one of three Purple Hearts that Bill Thomas received during his service in Vietnam.

"He said he didn't feel like he had earned it," Thomas said, noting the president looked thinner in person than on television.

Thomas said he and his wife came up with the unprecedented idea to present the president with the Purple Heart over breakfast one morning a few months ago as they discussed the verbal attacks, both foreign and domestic [Emphasis Crablaw], the commander in chief has withstood during his time in office.

"We feel like emotional wounds and scars are as hard to carry as physical wounds," Thomas said.
If Bush had any class, he would have thanked Mr. Thomas, invited him to the White House, shaken his hand and encouraged him to donate his Purple Heart to the Smithsonian Institution or to a public school in his community. Or to sell it on eBay and donate the funds to a rehab center to provide career training and PT for amputee veterans of Mr. Bush's Mesopotamian foreign policy disaster. But NEVER, NEVER to accept a medal he did not earn, even as a token of friendship. This is horrible. And the Republicans have the nerve to accuse Democrats of ruining morale among the troops?

But Bush needs a photo op, and that's what this undoubtedly Republican Texan has probably been propped up to give him. It's important that Enemies of the State make this backfire on him.

Let me get this straight: when you are in public office and get criticized for your multitude of horrific screw-ups by political opponents, journalists, commentators and foreign heads of state, that's like getting shot in the testicles or losing a foot. Or an eye. The reward is apparently the same: a Purple Heart.

As the son of a Vietnam Vet who was returned stateside on medical after contracting the local virulent form of pneumonia there, and who received no Purple Heart for his foreign service performed, hazards faced and sufferings borne, I cannot begin to describe in clean English my complete and utter contempt for this miserable, corrupt and insufferably awful excuse for a President.

I am deeply ashamed that he is my countryman, let alone President. A better country would not tolerate this.

Labels: , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

Meta: At Which Time Crablaw's Editor Put Down His Crack-Pipe....
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

[Editor's note: to the Bar Authorities of Maryland and the District of Columbia, the following is a satirical "rant" in the irreverent style of a "blogger" who is pretending to abuse a non-existent employee and to violate that employee's civil and statutory rights. The account is fictional and is intended for humor purposes only. Crablaw Maryland Weekly (CMW) and Crab Media uphold the duty of an attorney in both the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia to observe all laws and to promote their observance. Nothing in this rant should be taken so as to endorse misconduct or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice as defined by any attorney disciplinary authority or court.]

[To all drug enforcement agencies: CMW does not endorse the use of any illegal or controlled substance except as lawfully prescribed and as used in accordance with that lawful prescription. In addition, CMW does not endorse the possession, use or sale of any drug paraphenalia as defined by applicable statute.]

[To the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation of the State of Maryland and the United States Department of Labor: as noted above, no employee actually exists here. No attempt has been made to interfere, unlawfully or otherwise, with any attempt by any employee to form, join or participate in the management of a union or union local.]

[To all agencies of the United States Department of Homeland Security: notwithstanding any representations to the contrary, which were in each case intended as humor and not as a representation of facr or actual intention, there is no relationship between Crab Media and any foreign dealer in artemia or other aquacultural products.]

When I came into Crab Media's world headquarters this morning, I had to kick Theodore, my editor-in-chief and technical advisor, hard in the rear end. I got a look at how poorly the site presented itself on Internet Explorer. Theodore did it again. I had to remind Theodore that I had his union shop steward on the crack pipe through "my people" and that I knew that the shop steward was supplying Theodore with crack himself. I warned Theodore that I was not above cleaning house, that I was cash-rich and that if my people in China shipped me another shipment of "artemia" (wink, wink) I would be cash rich after I put the "artemia" on the street enough to move Crab Media's headquarters away from Reisterstown to just outside of Zurich, leaving Theodore's Natty-Boh drinking rear-end stuck in Arbutus, of all forsaken places.

Theodore better recognize that I am not joking. After the jerk-around on today's MARC train, I want to move to a place where trains observe schedules, and the best place to do that is the country that turned clock- and watch-making into folk art.

To Crablaw's readers who use Internet Explorer, I apologize. I was so proud of myself for how I had handled the coding for Mozilla that I failed to test for Internet Explorer - a ghastly, sub-amateur design oversight. I have made a jerry-rig solution to the problem which I, frankly, don't like; IE and Mozilla show all of the same material now reasonably, but with a different spacing between the 2nd and 3rd columns. I may be able to fix that later today, but I don't have a lot of time to be away from my day job. In any event, thank you for your patience.
Jokes and snark aside, thanks for your patience with the recent changes; hope they help you get more out of this site. The foregoing above was a rushed attempt to tie 15 inside jokes from this site and recent reports of government heavy-handedness into something funny. Take none of it seriously; I respect the government, just want it more prudently administered with different policy priorities. Would erase the material above, but I don't like erasing material including material I grow not to like; seems like copping out, just a personal opinion for this site. Thanks.

Labels: , , , ,



Trackback
Permalink/Below the Fold

22 April 2007
How Fascism Starts
Click HERE to Bring Up Full Post

WARNING: this YouTube is of a VERY, VERY indecent comedy presentation and is NOT for everyone. I enjoy indecent humor in certain contexts (I LOVE the late Richard Pryor), but what I enjoy after the kids are sound asleep may be profoundly offensive to some Crablaw readers, whose varied sensibilities on such matters I respect and have attempted to accommodate more fully in matters of style in recent months.

This YouTube does not constitute normal Crablaw Maryland Weekly fare. There have been a lot of stylistic changes at CMW over this weekend but this YouTube is not among them.

In my view, the probative value of this tape as a sign of our times substantially exceeds its prejudicial effect of its offensiveness, to quote from a common evidentiary rule in my profession.

This tape is evidence of an assault, an act of malicious destruction of property (to wit the working papers of a performer) and disorderly conduct.

If you are offended by graphic sexual language, I have no m